SARA stands for The Species at Risk Act. SARA is an environmental bill that was
created in 2002 that provides out legal guidelines to the Canadian Endangered
Species Conservation Council. It is
represented by the Minister of the Environment, the Minister of Fisheries and
Oceans, and the Minister responsible for Parks Canada and the ministers
accountable for the provincial government of BC. The role of the council is to
create recovery strategies and implement the plans by coordinating the various
government agencies to ensure the continuity of the species at risk.[1]
The Humpback
whales have recently been taken off the threatened species list. Pipeline
projects have had financial importance for Canadians. The concerns of the
Cascadia coastal region have led to potential conspiracies regarding the
conditional approval of the Northern Gateway pipeline and the convenient timing
of the Humpback whales being taken off the threatened species list. This has led to questioning from the
scientific, environmental committees and individuals if the process of
enlisting an animal into SARA is being taken seriously. More statements are
being raised about how weak our environmental protection laws really are. ’[2].
On June 2003, the Species
at Risk Act established Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in
Canada (COSEWIC) as an advisory body to the Canadian Endangered Species
Conservation Council. The COSEWIC are in
charge of assessing and making recommendations for animals to be placed in categories
that state if a species are of a low (least concern) or of a higher concern
category (threatened or endangered).[3] COSEWIC is made up of 31 members, and they include a
member from all the provinces and territories and four federal agencies. These
include the Canadian Wildlife Service, Parks Canada Agency, Department of
Fisheries and Oceans, and the Canadian Museum of Nature. Other members that must be chaired are the
Species Specialist Subcommittees (SSCs) and Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge
Subcommittee (ATK), and all the members are specialists[4] the field of environmental research.
The methodology
used in assessing Canadian wildlife includes the environmental reporters that
have been contracted to contact Species Specialist Subcommittees (SSCs),
Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Subcommittee (ATK). ATK assists with
traditional knowledge of the land to accurately find where species are, and
then fill out reports for COSEWIC. The reports must include: wildlife species
occurrence, wildlife species distribution, population size, Information related
to observed changes in biology and/or population size, potential threats,
existing management plans, harvesting restrictions, and Aboriginal name and
dialect. Species Specialist Subcommittees (SSCs) are members who have much
education in environmental studies that can properly identify species in order
to make a correct assessment on the animal’s risk factors.[5] COSEWIC’s use of subcommittees ensures that more
people are working to obtain the all the information needed to make an
assessment. Furthermore, report writers then must contact one of the government
members on the COSEWIC committee to review and assess the credibility of the
research. In the case of the Northern Pacific Humpback Whale, the researcher
would need to contact a Federal body such as Fisheries and Oceans. However, if a Humpback whale is in the Gwaii
Haanas National Marine Conservation Area and the Pacific Rim National Park
Reserve, then Parks Canada can be contacted. Once the research has been
reviewed, all voting constituents discuss the findings and vote on the status
of the species.[6]
Fishers and Oceans Canada lead the recovery strategy
for the humpback whale in cooperation and partnership with many organizations.
Fisheries and oceans are the competent ministers for aquatic species under the
Species at Risk Act (SARA). The Minister of Fisheries and Oceans is the
Honorable Gail Shea, member of the Conservative Party of Canada.[7]
The Conservative Party of Canada is recognized for placing the economy above
the continuity of our natural environment, and critics point out, to
environmental budgets being slashed because it interferes with Canada’s oil
industry.[8]
The North Pacific
Humpback Whale population has gone up considerably, in the end of the
commercial whaling industry the population went down from 30,000 to just 1500.
Today the North Pacific Humpback Whale population has jumped back to an
estimated population between 6000, to 8000.
“In 2003, North Pacific Humpback Whale
population status was assessed as Threatened by COSEWIC, and in 2005 the
population was listed as Threatened under SARA. The population was re-assessed
as Special Concern in 2011 by COSEWIC and this assessment was confirmed in
2013.“ [9]
The recovery of the North
Pacific Humpback Whale has come as a surprise, considering that many species
has been dying off. With proper
management through SARA and adjacent organizations and committees, the Humpback
has made a comeback. In 2014, the North
Pacific Humpback was placed onto the “Special Concern” section in the species
at risk act.[10]
The committees that
reinstated the Humpback whale under special concern in the SARA were instantly
criticized because of what they seen as convenient timing of the Northern
gateway pipeline. The conditional approval through the Federal government's
reinstatement of the Humpback Whale. The Enbridge pipeline hopes to transport
diluted bitumen from the Alberta Oil Sands, to the west coast of British
Columbia in the town of Kitimat where it would be shipped overseas to Asian
markets. Conditional Approval of the Pipeline happened on June 17th. In April,[11] a few environmentalists
lashed out when the Humpback was re-assessed as Special concern. Scott Wallace,
senior research scientist for the David Suzuki Foundation, spoke against the
reinstatement of the Humpback Whale. He stated that they changed the status of
the Humpback within a matter of months, and said that it was because of the oil
industry. Wallace was misleading because
COSEWIC completed an assessment on the North Pacific Humpback whale back
in 2011, and it was not until April of 2014 that the Humpback Whales was
officially reinstated from threatened to special concern. However, the Protection
that SARA gives to species could be increased.
David Suzuki is famous
for his show, The Nature of Things on Canadian Broadcasters Associations
television channel, he is also a published author[12] and maintains that SARA
has many holes. Suzuki states, if the species could have an adverse economic
then the animal will go back to the scientific community of COSEWIC for further
review. He purports the plight of the
polar bear as an example, as it has been recommended to be on the endangered
species list five times yet they keep on postponing the decision. They continue
to ask for more studies. For a qualitative argument against SARA, Suzuki
states “only 445 out of 551 species
identified as at risk by COSEWIC have been listed.” David explains how SARA
laws only apply to Federal government land such as post offices, national
parks, airports and RCMP detachments.
However offers no protection to land that is in provincial
jurisdiction. Proper qualitative and
quantitative research show what top environmental scientists such as David
Suzuki are saying about the political or environmental recovery for either the
whale or industry. Projections show this
will provide a strong academic of the situation and can see how his high
academic quality can hold up to various news sources. It is also important to
assess the environmental committee that are involved with advising Canadian
Endangered Species Conservation Council.[13]
The Humpback whale
population should come as a surprise and should be celebrated, with careful
examination of the population by COSEWIC in 2011, and its status change in SARA
was warranted. It is easy to dismiss
claims that the whales removal from the threatened species was due to the
Enbridge Pipeline project. David Suzuki
and his associate Scott Wallace do both address concerns about how long it
takes for a species to have a comprehensive study done, and how COSEWIC reviews
are not always taken seriously. David Suzuki backs this with quantitative
evidence showing how our native animals are not the top priority and how the
laws in animal protection need to be strengthened. David Suzuki is a watchdog
for COSEWIC and it is his job to be critical of environmental laws, so it is
natural for the economic driven conservative government that slashes funding
for environmental groups, to be in conflict with environmental groups.
.
Bibliography
“COSEWIC, Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in
Canada, Contact Us.” 2014a. Accessed November 22. <http://www.cosewic.gc.ca/eng/sct0/status_change_e.cfm.>
COSEWIC. 2014b. Accessed November 23.<
http://www.cosewic.gc.ca/eng/sct6/sct6_4_e.cfm.>
“David
Suzuki | David Suzuki Foundation.” 2014. Accessed November 27. <http://www.davidsuzuki.org/david/.<
“Instructions
for the Preparation of COSEWIC Status Reports.” 2014. Accessed November 23. <http://www.cosewic.gc.ca/htmldocuments/Instructions_e.htm.>
“NetNewsledger.com
- If We Really Cared about Endangered Species - David Suzuki.” 2014. Accessed
October 23. <http://www.netnewsledger.com/2014/03/12/if-we-really-cared-about-endangered-species-david-suzuki/.>
“Northern
Gateway Pipeline Approved with 209 Conditions - Politics - CBC News.” 2014.
Accessed September 25. <http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/northern-gateway-pipeline-approved-with-209-conditions-1.2678285.>
“Our
Take: Timing of Whale Decision Seems Very Convenient - Cowichan News Leader
Pictorial.” 2014. Accessed October 23. <http://www.cowichannewsleader.com/opinion/256628961.html.>
“Sierra
Club BC.” 2014. Accessed October 23. <http://www.sierraclub.bc.ca/search?Subject:list=species
at risk.>
“Species
at Risk Act.” 2013, March. <http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/S-15.3/page-2.html#docCont.>
“Species
Profile (Humpback Whale) - Species at Risk Public Registry.” 2011, April. <http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/species/speciesDetails_e.cfm?sid=148.>
“The
Honourable Gail Shea | Prime Minister of Canada.” 2013, September. <http://pm.gc.ca/eng/minister/honourable-gail-shea.>
“Why
Are These Humpback Whale Conservationists Applauding the Harper Government? |
Metro.” 2014. Accessed November 23. <http://metronews.ca/news/canada/1014647/why-are-these-humpback-whale-conservationists-applauding-the-harper-government/.>
[1] (“Species at Risk Act” 2013)
[2] (“Our take: Timing of whale decision seems very
convenient - Cowichan News Leader Pictorial,” 2014.)
[3] (“COSEWIC, Committee on the Status of Endangered
Wildlife in Canada, Contact Us” 2014a)
[4] (“COSEWIC, Committee on the Status of Endangered
Wildlife in Canada, About” 2014b)
[5] (“Instructions for the Preparation of COSEWIC Status
Reports” 2014)
[6] (“Why Are These Humpback Whale Conservationists Applauding
the Harper Government?, Metro” 2014)
[7] (“The Honourable Gail Shea, Prime Minister of Canada”
2013)
[8] (“Sierra Club BC” 2014)
[9] (“Species Profile (Humpback Whale) - Species at Risk
Public Registry” 2011)
[10] (“Species Profile (Humpback Whale) - Species at Risk
Public Registry” 2011)
[11] (“Northern Gateway Pipeline Approved with 209
Conditions, Politics , CBC News” 2014)
[12] (“David Suzuki, David Suzuki Foundation” 2014)
[13] (“NetNewsledger.com, If we really cared about endangered
species - David Suzuki,” 2014)


No comments:
Post a Comment